Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Anderson et al v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2016cv04114
Plaintiff:
William Anderson and Kristi Anderson
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis , City of Minneapolis Police Department, City of Minneapolis Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The
as 1:2016cv01754
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludwig v. USF Holland, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00044
Defendant:
USF Holland, Inc. and Ronnie D. York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
York v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2015cv00476
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Dwight D York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Darvell York v. United States, et al
as 15-2661
Petitioner - Appellant:
Darvell D. York
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Denise Wilson
York v. Wilson et al
as 0:2015cv01861
Petitioner:
Darvell D. York
Respondent:
Denise Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
York et al v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 12th MAN FOUNDATION a/k/a THE 12TH MAN FOUNDATION
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sammy D York , Henry H Holubec and Gregory R Hayes
Defendant:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 12th MAN FOUNDATION a/k/a THE 12TH MAN FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
York v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv02457
Petitioner:
Clayton D. York
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caldwell v. Kelly et al
as 5:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Caldwell
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, D York, Floss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04784
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis , Duane P. Ford , Cynthia E. Ford and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
