Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Gordon v. Turner et al
as 2:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R. Gordon
Defendant:
Tenorris F. Turner and IFCO Systems US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Turner-Bey v. Norman
as 4:2013cv00432
Petitioner:
Oscar F. Turner-Bey
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PNC Bank, N.A. v. TFT & Co., Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
TFT & Co., Inc. , Terry F. Turner and Margaret H. Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Turner v. McCall
as 4:2013cv00895
Petitioner:
William F Turner
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00538
Plaintiff:
Lisa F. Turner and George W. Turner, Sr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rushing v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Garrett M Rushing
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Heard, Unknown Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Turner v. GGNSC Morgantown LLC
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Nancy F. Turner
Defendant:
GGNSC Morgantown LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al v. The State of Alabama, et al (PANEL)(LEAD)
as 2:2012cv00691
Plaintiff:
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus , Bobby Singleton , Alabama Association of Black County Officials and others
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
