Cases 21 - 30 of 2,969
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Sarratt
as 5:2024ct03075
Plaintiff:
Trinel Lamont Humphrey
Defendant:
Officer R.A. Sarratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Cleophus Humphrey
as 24-1636
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cleophus Humphrey
Walsh v. Transphorm, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc., Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
Smith v. Transphorm, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tara Smith
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc, Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
HUMPHREY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03929
Plaintiff:
JULIE HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ortiz v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Cindy Ortiz
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, Henry Topps, Joshua Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
