Cases 21 - 30 of 11,982
v. Nicolas et al
as 1:2024cv01584
Defendant:
Ms. Natacha Nicolas, Mayor and City Council of Ocean City and Mr. Vincent J. Holloway, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Defendant:
Wendy Nickolas, Ms. Lampert, Deborah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Easley v. Didion et al.
as 3:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Easley
Defendant:
Correction Officer Megan Marie Didion, Correction Officer Spiegner and Ms. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Striegel v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Ferris Striegel
Defendant:
Ms. Peterson, Sgt. Couler and Sgt. Windstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. MTC et al
as 3:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Ajalon Baker
Respondent:
MTC, TDCJ, FNU Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SETH NORRIS, individually and as warden of Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and others
Cranmer v. Securus-J-Pay et al
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Cranmer
Defendant:
Securus-J-Pay, Potosi Correctional Center and Ms. Unknown Sansegraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
