Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Rose v. Taylor et al
as 3:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Rose
Defendant:
Stephen Michael Taylor, P&S Transportation, LLC and John Doe Defendants 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stine v. Homan Trucking LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02202
Defendant:
Homan & Company, Inc., A.B.C.D. Transportation, Co., Inc., Homan Trucking LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gearold R. Stine and Gearold R. Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2018cv03315
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv05046
Defendant:
SEARGENT A. LEBESCO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O. MURRAY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Stephan et al
as 0:2018cv02985
Defendant:
Washington, Peoples, Unknown Sergant and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Berryhill
as 6:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Dianne R. Rose
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Irwin R Rose & Company LLC v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Irwin R Rose & Company LLC
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company , Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company , Chubb Custom Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pascual v. Buffalo Wild Wings Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brian Pascual
Defendant:
Buffalo Wild Wings Inc., Janice L. Fields, Scott O. Bergren and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rose v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
Donnie R. Rose
Respondent:
Jerry Bartruff and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silas v. Rose et al
as 4:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steve Silas
Defendant:
R. Rose and J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
