Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Diaz v. Ingram et al
as 5:2013cv00906
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, J. Gridy and Sergeant W. Ingram
Plaintiff:
Raul Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A TOTAL OF $751,355.28 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF: et al
as 2:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
A TOTAL OF $751,355.28 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF, $163,100 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANCO POPULAT BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 6809282293 IN THE NAME OF RAUL DIAZ, $123,481.05 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN BANK OF AMERICA MONEY MARKET SAVINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 898053240210 IN THE NAME OF GUILLERMO S. DIAZ and others
Claimant:
Raul Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. Raul Diaz-Moreno
as 12-40020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL DIAZ-MORENO
USA v. Victor Barahona-Diaz
as 10-41223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR BARAHONA-DIAZ, also known as Francis Arnoldo Martinez-Portillo, also known as Nelson Montesino, also known as Israel Torres-Pagan, also known as Raul Diaz Arce, also known as Victor Diaz, also known as Israel Pagan Torres, also known as Diablo Chav
Diaz-Garcia v. Holland
as 0:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Raul Diaz-Garcia
Defendant:
J. C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raul Diaz-Aguilar v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-73338
Petitioner:
RAUL DIAZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
US v. Raul Martinez
as 08-4674
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL DIAZ MARTINEZ
McCray v. City of Fort Lauderdale et al
as 0:2008cv60349
Plaintiff:
Sheila McCray
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale, John Loges, Jim Polan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
