Cases 21 - 29 of 29
COMMON PURPOSE USA, INC. v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
COMMON PURPOSE USA, INC.
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA E. LYNCH, VANITA GUPTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SOLOW v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2015cv05019
Plaintiff:
ADAM M. SOLOW
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, THOMAS BRANDON, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAGINSKI v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv01225
Plaintiff:
MARK BAGINSKI
Defendant:
THOMAS BRANDON and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thomas Walls v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10444
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS BRANDON WALLS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund et al v. Lineation Markings Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01823
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund , Chris Christopherson , Marian Bourboulis and others
Defendant:
Lineation Markings Corporation and Luke Middleton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Walls v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00927
Petitioner:
Thomas Brandon Walls
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joiner et al v. Mutchnick et al
as 1:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Joiner , Thomas Brandon Lund and Michael D. Malone
Defendant:
Max Mutchnick, Stanley Small and Air Comfort Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Casto v. Catalyst Refiners, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01416
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brandon Casto
Defendant:
Catalyst Refiners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv01587
Petitioner:
THOMAS BRANDON DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
