Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. The Copper Door Bar, Inc., et al
as 8:2019cv01458
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Sony/ATV Songs LLC, Rondor Music International, Inc. d/b/a Irving Music and others
Defendant:
Duk Whan Oh, The Copper Door Bar, Inc. d/b/a The Copper Door, The Copper Door Bar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Smoke Rings Cigar Bar, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01142
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Buzzard Rock Music, Universal Music MGB NA LLC and others
Defendant:
Michael Barletta, Smoke Rings Cigar Bar, Inc., Thomas Trella and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc et al v. Carrie Bell, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01517
Defendant:
Randall Jones, Renell Jones, Karen Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Mokojumbi Music, Universal Music-Z Tunes LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Whirlow Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., PWMP Acquisition I LLC, Thelonious Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Whirlow Company, Inc., Michael Edward Whirlow, Lisa Gaye Whirlow and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Silliman
as 5:2019cv00378
Defendant:
David Ray Silliman, MJ and David Ray Silliman individually doing business as MJ's Music Bar also known as MJ's Music Bar & Banquet Facility
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Crompton Songs, Gibb Brothers Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. IV, INC.
as 2:2019cv00501
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., UNIVERSAL MUSIC MGB NA LLC, GUIRO MUSIC and others
Defendant:
IV, INC., ROBERT RICHARDSON and RICHARD HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. McBride Entertainment, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00026
Plaintiff:
Sea Gayle Music LLC, Songs of Universal, Inc., EMI Blackwood Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Skylar McBride, David McBride, McBride Entertainment, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Estate of James Oscar Smith v. Cash Money Records, Inc.
as 19-28
Defendant / Appellee:
EMI Music Publishing Management, LLC, Universal Music- MGB NA, LLC, Universal Music Group Distribution, Corp. and others
Defendant:
Jordan Evans, Stephen Hacker and Matthew Jehu Samuels, AKA BOI-1DA
Appellant:
Hebrew Hustle, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Aubrey Drake Graham, AKA Drake
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of James Oscar Smith
Amicus Curiae:
Betsy Rosenblatt, Yvette Joy Liebesman, Edward Lee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
