Cases 31 - 40 of 72,745
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Burkes v. Sweeny et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Nathaniel Sweeny, Lance Sands, Joshua Carder and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
4301 N Delaware QOB LLC v. Selective Insurance Co of South Carolina
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
4301 N DELAWARE QOB LLC
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Okorie v. First Bank
as 24-60273
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
First Bank, Eileen N. Shaffer, Timothy Matthew Farris and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deere v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Deere
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catlett v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Angela Catlett
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Patrick Dean Blanchard, Charles Michael Dickens, James A. Segars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
