Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00893
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Buccina et al v. Racette et al
as 9:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Santino Buccina and Sharrisa M. Buccina
Defendant:
Steven E. Racette, T. Balcom, Colin R. Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALCOM v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2015cv00190
Petitioner:
JOHN W. BALCOM, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02299
Plaintiff:
Duane Allen Sanders , Richard L. Maday , Jon M. Balcom and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALCOM v. CARAWAY
as 2:2014cv00392
Petitioner:
ERIC EUGENE BALCOM
Respondent:
JOHN CARAWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Balcom v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05670
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
John J. Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
BALCOM v. USA
as 4:2014cv00306
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ERIC EUGENE BALCOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Balcom, et al v. Mendenhall, et al
as 14-2074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF HELEN ESTINE MENDENHALL, DECEASED, B SCOTT BALCOM, as Personal Representative and individually and GINA DILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS MENDENHALL and MENDENHALL TRUST
Green v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01855
Defendant:
Guy Balcom, Donald Burnette, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Conrad Green, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balcom et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-03318
Plaintiff:
Daniel Balcom and Lisa Balcom
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
