Cases 31 - 40 of 1,312
Varner v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Varner
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, FCPD/Head Chaplain Henry Hansard and Rev. Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sossamon v. State of Texas
as 24-10315
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Lonestar State of Texas, E.F. Hazelwood, Adezyanju Fadeyen, Chaplain, Alred Unit and others
ForeIn re: Fore
as 24-123
Petitioner:
In re: CHAPLAIN HARRY FORE
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Harris v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dwight Harris
Defendant:
King County Jail, King County Chaplain Department, King County Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Curry v. Dollar General et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Celeste J Curry
Defendant:
Dollar General, Alexis Chaplain, Laura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Davis and Chaplain Alfred Marcus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yates v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Banon G Yates
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez and Harris County Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Edgar Goodwin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shian, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
