Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,626
Hawkins v. State of Miss.
as 1:2024cv00075
Petitioner: George Verlon Hawkins
Respondent: State of Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. LaRou et al
as 2:2024cv10960
Plaintiff: Desmond A. Williams
Defendant: Madison LaRou, Johnson and Hawkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Hawkins, et al v. David Stoddard, et al
as 24-11142
Plaintiff: WILLIAM HAWKINS, CARLON HAWKINS and ADVOCACY TRUST, LLC
Defendant: DAVID STODDARD, GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, DAVID L. STODDARD and others
Hawkins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01305
Plaintiff: Bolivia Hawkins
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent: NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner: Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Collin Hawkins
as 24-6332
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: COLLIN HAWKINS
Williams #201665 v. LaRou et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Desmond A. Williams #201665
Defendant: Madison LaRou, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Hawkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff: George Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant: Robin Allen and Dr. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Hawkins et al v. Zenner et al
as 2:2024cv00788
Defendant: Shonda Zenner, Thomas Zenner, Shonda K Fliehs and others
Plaintiff: Meredith Hawkins, Appaloosa Trail LLC, Sea Strand LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?