Cases 31 - 40 of 434
Rhinehardt v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell Rhinehardt, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Merrick B. Garland and Dena J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
King et al v. Wal-mart Stores East I, LP
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Doretta J King, J R King, Doretta J. King and others
Defendant:
wal-mart stores east I, lp, Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wengeler v. King et al
as 2:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Carl Wengeler
Defendant:
Lauren J King, David G Estudillo, Richard Creatura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. King
as 6:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff E J King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18614
Plaintiff:
ARSOUN J KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. California
as 3:2022cv01397
Petitioner:
Simon J. King
Respondent:
California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarpa v. King et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ralph C. Jarpa
Defendant:
J. King, Ted Hull and Ms. M. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Noah J King
Defendant:
Robert Case, Bailey Burns, Brianna Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
FRANCIS v. MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRANCIS
Defendant:
MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, OFFICER J KING, SGT E WILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
