Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Frederick Banks v. Hon. Richard W. Roberts, et al
as 16-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Hon. Richard W. Roberts, Hon. Henry H. Kennedy, Rosemary M. Collyer and others
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Robert et al
as 2:2016cv00720
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Robert, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mark Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITWIN v. WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE et al
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE, III, GEORGE BABICH, JR., STEPHEN N. DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kelsch et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14818
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Kelsch and Michael Kelsch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rousseau v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2015cv04496
Plaintiff:
Julie S Rousseau
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pearson v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 6:2014cv04051
Plaintiff:
Julie S Pearson
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jarrell v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 2:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Jarrell
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I , Centimark Corporation and Wimco Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
