Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Burns v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04927
Plaintiff:
Shelly L Burns
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balestrieri et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11874
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Brown, Michael Baudille, Benjamin Berman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Burns v. Aramark et al
as 5:2018cv05768
Defendant:
Aramark and Santa Rita Jail
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Thompson et al
as 3:2018cv04581
Defendant:
Lt. L. Delbridge, Lt. R. Bowers, Sgt. P. Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00072
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tialisa L. Burns and Tialisa L Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burns v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00055
Petitioner:
Robert L. Burns, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts, Amherst et al v. Manning et al
as 3:2018cv30003
Plaintiff:
Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Nicholas Consolini
Defendant:
Robert J Manning , R. Norman Peters , James R Buonomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv17164
Plaintiff:
Anita L Burns
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
United States of America v. Burns
as 2:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Guy L Burns, III
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
