Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Greene v. University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine et al
as 2:2010cv04228
Plaintiff:
Michael Gary Greene
Defendant:
University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, DeVry, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary v. Owens et al
as 5:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Carlton Michael Gary
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Steve Upton, Glenn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Terry
as 4:1997cv00181
Petitioner:
Carlton Michael Gary
Respondent:
William Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Angela Jones, Angela Jones, Shaniqua Gary and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, City of Richmond, C. T. Woody, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35945
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008mc00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James v. Nettles, et al
as 3:2008cv02413
Plaintiff:
Jerva Edward James
Defendant:
Michael Gary Nettles, John Bejimen Alpin and Robert M Stevenson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gary v. Hall et al
as 5:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Carlton Michael Gary
Defendant:
Hilton Hall and Henry Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell v. Hamm et al
as 3:2008cv08003
Plaintiff:
Michael Gary Snell
Defendant:
Mary E Hamm, A Enanoria, Alverez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
