Cases 31 - 40 of 207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WRIGHT v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Wright v. Contra Costa Country, et al
as 22-15719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTRA COSTA COUNTRY, DEVON BELL and MARK PETTERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wright v. Contra Costa Country et al
as 4:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
Contra Costa Country, Devon Bell and Mark Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, City of Portland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Guy Clark, Linda Corwin, Craig Corwin and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Camille C Touton, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Keith Frainey, et al
as 21-3067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH FRAINEY, MICHAEL WRIGHT, ANASTASIA WIEREMA and others
Robinson v. Wright et al
as 5:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Robinson
Defendant:
Michael Wright, Matthew Mullen and Tonia Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
