Cases 31 - 40 of 140
Crosby v. Petermann et al
as 1:2018cv09470
Plaintiff:
Tommie Crosby
Defendant:
P.L. McNeil, Christopher LaRosa, Tim Nguyem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01439
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Ryerson et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2018cv00731
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Ryerson and Debra Frost Ryerson
Counter Plaintiff:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wylie et al v. Platinum Equity LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Sara Wylie and Michael Wylie
Defendant:
Ryerson Inc, Platinum Equity LLC, Ryerson Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Margaret-Ilene Pullen v. Chuck Allen, et al
as 17-17475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET-ILENE PULLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK ALLEN, BIGGAR, BOB BRADUS and others
Abreu v. Kooi
as 17-3593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Doctor Kooi, Auburn Correctional Facility, Nurse Boyd, Auburn Correctional Facility, Gilfus, Correction Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: State of Texas
as 17-60191
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS
:
STATE OF NEVADA, NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, ENERGY NORTHWEST and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, JAMES RICHARD PERRY, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
