Cases 31 - 40 of 44
ANDREW v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON and BRUCE CHATMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Todd Andrew Mandel
as 4:2014mc00616
ANDREW v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KIRK and JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03655
Plaintiff:
George Dillard , Linda Bridge , Tana Gilbert and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dillard et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04633
Plaintiff:
George Dillard , Linda Bridge , Tana Gilbert and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothschild v. Davis et al
as 8:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gwen R. Rothschild and Gwen R. Rothschild
Defendant:
Todd Andrew Davis and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Chavera v. Bell
as 2:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Esther M Chavera
Defendant:
Todd Andrew Bell and Liquid Environmental Solutions of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Abdul Amiri v. Todd Kelting, et al
as 09-7061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul Wakil Amiri
Defendant - Appellee:
Todd Andrew Kelting, Mr., Counsel for Gelman Management Company and Deckel, Baum, Ogens and Raftery, Law Firm Employer to Attorney
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENISON
as 1:2009mc00022
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
TODD ANDREW DENISON
US v. Todd Herbert
as 08-8489
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TODD ANDREW HERBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
