Cases 31 - 40 of 654
United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc. v. Wu & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Hamer Electric, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
Wu & Associates, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company et al
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
High Point Electric & Fire, LLC, High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and others
Defendant:
Up-Side Management Company and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 5366 LOGISTICS LEOPARDO MPA SDVOSB JV, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Borek's Concrete Company
Defendant:
5366 Logistics Leopardo MPA SDVOSB JV, LLC, Continental Casualty Company d/b/a CNA Financial Corporation and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY doing business as CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Conner Development Group, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of CONNER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., and Conner Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC v. Mission Support Services, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
the United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC
Defendant:
Mission Support Services, LLC, Federal Insurance Company, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Briggs Brothers Enterprises Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Satco, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant:
Briggs Brothers Enterprises Corporation and RLI Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al
as 3:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BREAKER ELECTRIC, INC. v. VALIANT GROUP, LLC
as 3:2023cv16815
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BREAKER ELECTRIC, INC.
Defendant:
VALIANT GROUP, LLC, COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC v. AECOM Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
AECOM Construction, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, an Indiana Corporation and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. et al v. Poettker Construction Company et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Counter Defendant:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blankenship Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Poettker Construction Company, Zodiac-Poettker HBZ Joint Venture II, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
