Cases 31 - 40 of 360
Ballard v. ChannelAdvisor Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
ChannelAdvisor Corporation, Timothy Buckley, David Spitz and others
Stein v. ChannelAdvisor Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv08282
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
ChannelAdvisor Corporation, Timothy Buckley, David Spitz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Wingo v. USA
as 4:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
Edward Wingo, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cook v. Wingo et al
as 4:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Don Lloyd Cook
Defendant:
Ryan Wingo, Jeff Sheeler, John S Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robert Harris v. Kasey Wingo, et al
as 22-10905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DALE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KASEY P. WINGO, individually, MICHAEL D. CHAPMAN, individually and SCOTT PEPIN
Pickett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Defendant:
Ronnie Barnett, Bo, Tammie McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
