Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Connsero v. Foulk et al
as 2:2014cv01541
Plaintiff:
Michael Connsero
Defendant:
F Foulk, Lewis, M Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Via et al v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
as 2:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R Via and Crystal Fannon
Defendant:
Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Michael McDonald, et al
as 14-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Fredrick Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD, BIVINS, D. DAVEY and others
Fannon et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Buford Fannon and Carol Hucks Fannon
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FANNON et al v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
BUFORD FANNON and CAROL HUCKS FANNON
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC., BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, BIOMET U.S. RECONSTRUCTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fannon v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv07026
Plaintiff:
Karen Lynn Albanese Fannon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant:
Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fannon v. Patterson et al
as 3:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Chistian P Fannon
Defendant:
Don Patterson, Ben Charles, Doug Kowalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jadco Enterprises, Inc. v. Fannon et al
as 6:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jadco Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
James D. Fannon , C&F Contractors, LLC , J and H Enterprises of Virginia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
