Cases 41 - 50 of 54
ROGERS v. CURRY et al
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
YEHOCHANAN ABIJAH and CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Defendant:
TERRY CURRY and JEREMY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dugan et al
as 3:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
David R Dugan, Tom Hatcher and Brooke Strays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00487
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edd Christopher Rogers v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv06506
Defendant:
Bernal, California Dept of Adult Parole Operations, California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Plaintiff:
Edd Christopher Rogers
Christopher Rogers v. Phillip Kern
as 11-3152
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP KERNS, Warden
US v. Christopher Roger
as 11-4024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company v. Rogers et al
as 4:2010cv04485
Plaintiff:
Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher Rogers, Shaun Rogers, Douglas Rogers and others
Cross_claimant:
The Estate of Frank Tucker
Cross_defendant:
Douglas Rogers
Counter_claimant:
The Estate of Frank Tucker
Counter_defendant:
Douglas Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rodgers v. Kerns
as 2:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
Christopher Rogers
Respondent:
Phillip Kerns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skyward Construction Inc. v. Rogers et al
as 3:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Skyward Construction Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Rogers and Rogers Consulting and Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
