Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Allen v. Michigan State University
as 1:2018cv00887
Defendant:
Gary Stollak, Michigan State University, Lawrence Gerard Nassar and others
Plaintiff:
Suma Cherukuri, Sarah Allen, Jaclyn Charters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babb v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2018cv05215
Plaintiff:
Demond Lavelle Babb
Defendant:
City of Tacoma , John Does 1-2, Jane Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GATEWOOD v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
MARQUICE GATEWOOD
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, CHERYL STEBERGER, JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bradfield v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bradfield
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc, Kimberly Allen, FNU Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Conmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Cyle J. Moore
Defendant:
Conmed, Inc. , Conmed, LLC , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farkas v. Engels et al
as 5:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Matthew Farkas
Defendant:
Engels, Mosher, Broulette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEEL v. ELIASEN et al
as 1:2017cv02253
Plaintiff:
KAMERON TEEL
Defendant:
SERGEANT ELIASEN , BOROUGH OF GLASSBORO , JOHN DOES 1-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00278
Defendant:
Police Officer Kyle Contino, John Doe and Jane Doe #1-7 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Tony Holley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Mixon et al
as 3:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson and Heather Jackson
Defendant:
Eddie Mixon, Jason Blackmon, Andrea Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
