Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Hyndrizky et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02019
Plaintiff:
Steve Robert Hyndrizky , B.S. Dairy , Bernal R. Cichy and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Darrin Keith James v. Weigele et al
as 1:2014cv04027
Plaintiff:
Estate of Darrin Keith James and Darrin Keith James
Defendant:
Michael George Weigele and Purdy Brothers Trucking Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sears v. White
as 5:2014hc02230
Petitioner:
Keith James Sears
Respondent:
Susan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sexton v. Mims et al
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Keith James Sexton
Defendant:
Gregory Mims, Janet Shackleford, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEXTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
KEITH JAMES SEXTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Sears v. Susan White
as 13-7667
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH JAMES SEARS
Respondent - Appellee:
SUSAN WHITE
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
James v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2013cv00734
Petitioner:
Keith James
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
James v. Moore
as 3:2013cv01461
Petitioner:
Keith James
Respondent:
Ernie Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
James v. Marion Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Keith James
Defendant:
Marion Arkansas, City of and Woody Wheeless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
James v. Morgan et al
as 9:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rodney Keith James
Defendant:
James Morgan, Richard Kaskiw and Candice Wilber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
