Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Minyard Davis v. Dave Simon
as 14-7623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINYARD CASS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE SIMONS, WILLIE BHAGIRATH, D. V. PERRY and others
Sutton v. Lease
as 1:2014cv01846
Plaintiff:
Whitney L. Sutton
Defendant:
Destini Ann Lease
Garnishee:
VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Coram et al v. Shepherd Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ian Coram , George Bright , Philip Hess and others
Defendant:
Shepherd Communications, Inc. , Time Warner Cable, Inc. and Insight Communications Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MEYERS v. HYATT et al
as 2:2013cv06043
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MEYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HYATT, JACYLEN OTTINO, L. HASKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Simons et al
as 2:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Minyard Cass Davis
Defendant:
Dave Simons , Willie Bhagirath , D.V. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sutton v. Shared Hospital Services Corporation
as 3:2013cv00807
Plaintiff:
Larem L. Sutton
Defendant:
Shared Hospital Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Central States Fair v. Sutton Rodeos, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv05049
Plaintiff:
Central States Fair
Defendant:
Sutton Rodeos, Inc. and James L. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Franklin v. Fewell et al
as 3:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Printice Franklin
Defendant:
S Fewell, D Betzner, D Mygrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. FEWELL et al
as 1:2013cv01008
Defendant:
OFFICER D. BETZNER, OFFICER S. FEWELL, OFFICER D. MYGRANT and others
Plaintiff:
PRINTICE FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc. v. Sutton Salvage, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sutton Salvage, LLC, Mitchell's Mobile Mashing and Mitchell L. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
