Cases 41 - 50 of 152
Village Green at Sayville, LLC v. Town of Islip
as 19-3353
Defendant / Appellee:
The Planning Board of the Town of Islip, Kevin Brown, Mary Kate Mullen, individually and in their official capacity as Members of the Town Board of the Town of Islip and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Village Green at Sayville, LLC
Zanghi v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2019cv05487
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Patrick Ferguson and Judith Ferguson
Plaintiff:
James Zanghi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. Director
as 6:2019cv00219
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID Director
Petitioner:
Michael Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MULHERN v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00671
Defendant:
RIVINDRA DEO, MICHAEL KENNEDY, RON MCCRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL MULHERN
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8470
Kennedy v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00673
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kennedy
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Kennedy v. Judge Chief, et al
as 19-20051
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, CHIEF JUDGE and ALL UNITED STATES JUDGES FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KENNEDY
Kennedy v. Judge Chief et al
as 4:2018cv04749
Defendant:
Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit and All United States Judges for U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Petitioner:
Michael Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16550
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garger et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11950
Plaintiff:
Brian Kennedy, Steven LaFrance, Iliana E Flores and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabi and Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
