Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01976
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell v. Amacker et al
as 2:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Cathy Russell
Defendant:
Dawn Amacker , St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office and George R. Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS, JR. v. HARTFORD BAKERY, INC.
as 3:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. CUMMINGS, JR.
Defendant:
HARTFORD BAKERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Van Buren v. Willard et al
as 1:2013cv01273
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
J. D. Willard, E. Wilson, N. Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv05238
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, Jack Strain, Jr, David Guchereau and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chadwick v. Cummings et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Claude Wayne Chadwick
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings, Scott Frost, Sim Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2012cv01538
Defendant:
MARK J. BOWEN, MARK EPPERSON, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
KRIS R. CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. Cummings et al
as 1:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jose Arturo Lujan Ruiz
Defendant:
Sam R Cummings, Nancy M Koenig, Amanda R. Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORDON PAPER COMPANY, INC. et al v. GORDON et al
as 2:2012cv06021
Plaintiff:
GORDON PAPER COMPANY, INC. and STEVEN GORDON
Defendant:
MARK GORDON , CAMELOT PAPERS, INC. , J&M CUMMING PAPER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
