Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Tate v. King
as 2:2025cv02130
Plaintiff:
Sharonda Tate
Defendant:
Michelle A King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. SCOTT
as 3:2025cv00892
Plaintiff:
JIMELLE JONES
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, SHARONDA MURRELL and SGT EDDY RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
Baltas v. Quiros
as 24-3267
Defendant:
SETH LOPREY, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SCOTT RULE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff:
JOE BALTAS
Sharonda Calderon v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Sharonda Calderon
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Artis v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv01502
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Ginger Davis, Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
WORTHEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01880
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
SHARONDA WORTHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Sharonda Fowler-White, et al.
as 4:2024cv03366
Defendant:
Bruce Landon White, Ernest White, Cedric White and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hogan v. Long et al
as 6:2024cv06108
Defendant:
Sgt Dale Reed, Sharonda Long, Deputy Director William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
LaQuince Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
