Cases 51 - 60 of 204
BAME v. D F RICHARD INC
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
D F RICHARD INC
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE BAME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coward et al v. Richard Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
E. B., Monica Embeck, Romell Barkus and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Prysby, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. A C D F
as 1:2020cv00126
Respondent:
A C D F
Petitioner:
Dennis Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
D F PACE, ESQUIRE v. BAKER-WHITE et al
as 2:2019cv04827
Defendant:
PLAINVIEW PROJECT, INJUSTICE WATCH and FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDER OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
EMILY BAKER-WHITE and D F PACE, ESQUIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lantern Maritime Company v. Chembulk Trading II LLC
as 4:2019cv03385
Defendant:
Chembulk Trading II LLC and Chembulk Ocean Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lantern Maritime Company
Garnishee:
Exxonmobile Chemical Interamerica Inc., Total Petrochemicals and Refining USA Inc., E D & F Man Liquid Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
FISCHMAN v. SMITHERS et al
as 1:2019cv03202
Defendant:
MEGAN SMITHERS, BRADLEY COOPER, TRAVIS WOMPLER and others
Plaintiff:
INGER SHANAH FISCHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Oberlander
as 3:2019cv01187
Respondent:
D. F. Oberlander and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Adrian Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stahlnecker et al v. Morris et al
as 4:2019cv00858
Plaintiff:
Dale C. Stahlnecker and Michele A. Stahlnecker
Defendant:
Sandra L. Morris and D&F Travel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
