Cases 51 - 60 of 683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gomez v Bludworth et al.
as 4:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Peter Bludworth, CO Infanger and Nurse McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
as 3:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Gray and Clell O. McCurdy
Defendant:
Mississppi Department of Rehabilitation Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCurdy v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05251
Plaintiff:
Theresa McCurdy
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) McCurdy v. Price, et al.
as 1:2021cv01699
Plaintiff:
James C. McCurdy
Defendant:
Price, Martinez, D. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McCurdy v. Price
as 2:2021cv02156
Plaintiff:
James C. McCurdy
Defendant:
Price, Martinez, D. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. McCurdy et al
as 6:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lamone Morlee Johnson, Marylin Monroe Porter and Marylin Monae Porter
Defendant:
Joel McCurdy and Utilizaton Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maureen Corneal v. Debra McCurdy
as 21-2063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAUREEN K. CORNEAL and MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D., KURT SCHMOKE, MICHELLE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
