Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Ulrich v. Scott et al
as 5:2014cv00037
Defendant:
Charles R Scott, Kenya Ellis, Jordan Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Hahmer Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Scott v. Samuel I. White, P.C.
as 13-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT and TERRY SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC and others
Hestand et al v. Clay County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gary Mitchell Hestand , Carolyn D. Hestand and Bert Hestand, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay County, Tennessee , Brandon Boone , Emilio Ricardo "R Lisi, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward #240660 et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ward #240660 and Terry Scott #448718
Defendant:
G. Thompson, Unknown Harrison, J. Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Hobbs
as 4:2012cv04123
Plaintiff:
Terry Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Hobbs
as 5:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Terry Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Roy Terry Scott
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Terry Hyder
as 12-4220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY SCOTT HYDER, a/k/a Ryan Terry Hyder, a/k/a Ryan Fred Wilson
Top Dollar Pawn, Gun and Car Audio #5 L L C v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Top Dollar Pawn Gun & Car Audio #5 L L C
Defendant:
Caddo Parish , Willie L Shaw, Jr , Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
