Cases 61 - 70 of 20,869
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3365
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3366
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOOKRA v. BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SOOKRA and APRIL BURCH-SOOKRA
Defendant:
BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL, PFIZER, INC., XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Myers et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03171
Plaintiff:
Heather Myers and Arthur Jeff Myers
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMPBELL v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
