Cases 61 - 70 of 58,198
KREASHKO v. GILPIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Defendant:
SOUTHERN ARMSTRONG REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, GILPIN TOWNSHIP, GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KREASHKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11150
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Armstrong
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Armstrong
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davidson et al v. Tralo Companies Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00354
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, Tralo Companies Inc, Anthony Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Davidson, Geraldine Davidson, Mark Daniel Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Armstrong-Deeble v. Valenti
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Linda Armstrong-Deeble
Defendant:
Leah Valenti
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Chapman et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Steven Matthew Armstrong
Defendant:
Travis Chapman, Nima Afshar, Haley Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
