Cases 61 - 70 of 1,393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1902
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bingham II v. Harner et al
as 3:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nathaniel Bingham II
Defendant:
Shawn Harner, Bernard Wojciechowski, Chris Gorki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons
as 1:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Respondent:
Tracey Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Metcalf v. Aguazo et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Jose Aguazo, Albert Gibbons, Tai Ban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Gibbons v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08494
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Gibbons
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALFORD et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. ALFORD, KATHLEEN A. ALFORD, DONNA MARIE BREAULT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons et al
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Tracey Gibbons, Dale J. Hilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
