Cases 61 - 70 of 131
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. et al v. Narconon International et al
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
National Association of Forensic Counselors, Inc. and American Academy of Certified Forensic Counselors Inc
Defendant:
Narconon International, Narconon of Georgia Inc, Friends of Narconon Intl and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Carl Smith v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 16-30076
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Smith v. Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00311
Respondent:
Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections and Kings County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Carl Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv07834
Plaintiff:
CARL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONOVAN TAYLOR, RN, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash et al v. Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 4:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Leon Nash and Carrie Lester
Defendant:
Metropolitan Housing Authority, Rodney Forte, Carl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03610
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith and Carl Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moorhead Brothers, Inc. v. Pipeline Energy Group, Inc.
as 15-3229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOORHEAD BROTHERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PIPELINE ENERGY GROUP, INC., dba Carl Smith Pipeline
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 8:2014cv03697
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carl Smith, Starelle J Gladden, J.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
