Cases 61 - 70 of 240
Haywood #520756 v. Zummer et al
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Unknown Girard, Unknown Grabowski, Unknown Chalker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Haywood #520756
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FILING ERROR
as 5:2020cv00413
Petitioner:
Michelle M Dunn, Mark Samolczyk, Theodore Savastano and others
Respondent:
Plain Local School District Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grabowski et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2020cv10105
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Grabowski and Giles Grabowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JTH Tax LLC v. Grabowski et al
as 1:2019cv08123
Defendant:
DAVID M. ROCCI, SUPERNAT LLC d/b/a LIBERTY TAX FRANCHISE, NATALIE GRABOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JTH TAX LLC d/b/a LIBERTY TAX SERVICE and JTH Tax LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Geiger v. PHH Mortgage-Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00057
Respondent:
Jeffrey Grabowski, Shehzad Sayed, Bernice Gerosaga and others
Claimant:
Jordan Mark Geiger
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PATEL v. CAMBREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv18474
Defendant:
BERNHARD HAMPL, LOUIS J. GRABOWSKY, KATHRYN RUDIE HARRIGAN, PH.D. and others
Plaintiff:
BIREN PATEL
Thompson v. Cambrex Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01793
Defendant:
Louis J. Grabowsky, Bernard Hampl, Ilan Kaufthal and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
STEIN v. CAMBREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv18106
Defendant:
BERNHARD HAMPL, LOUIS J. GRABOWSKY, KATHRYN RUDIE HARRIGAN, PH.D. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Grabowski v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 4:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Hannah Vivian Peterson, Benjamin James Crawford, Carlos Villarreal and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Grabowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
