Cases 61 - 70 of 27,288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02800
Plaintiff:
Alexander Mitchell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saxena v. Corinth, et al
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
MATTHEW CORINTH, ALASTAIR MCNIVEN, DANIELLE KAY KUNZE and others
Stipe v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Bruce L Stipe
Defendant:
Thomas Mitchell, Derek Mingo and Johnathan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Mitchell
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Diversitech Corporation
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Shantivia J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Diversitech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Montanez
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Bob Blum, Angela Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
