Cases 61 - 70 of 5,597
Michael Porter v. Officer Lechner
as 24-6353
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. PORTER
Defendant:
OFFICER LECHNER, OFFICER SMITH and SERGEANT WILBURN
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Corns v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03093
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Corns
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sgt. Santifull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seguin v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, in its official capacity, RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, GERO MEYERSIEK, in his individual and official capacity and others
Wilson v. The JPMorgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan
as 6:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
Michael D Wilson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michael D. Arthurs v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arthurs
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC Company Corporation doing business as Mr. Cooper, Jay Bray, Busy Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
