Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Fuller v. FUller et al
as 1:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert FUller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Waco Habitat for Humanity, et al
as 6:2017cv00062
Defendant:
Tracie Littrell, Jose Mullet, Brand Shuttlesworth and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Ellis et al
as 5:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Defendant:
Claude Ellis, Benjamin Davis and Sergeant Truesdale (D-1 Shift), et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01322
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MCKEOWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02475
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCKEOWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. , ROBERT ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. USA
as 1:2016cv01034
Petitioner:
Robert - Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Young
as 4:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Defendant:
Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. R.Z.S. Food Mart
as 6:2015cv00192
Defendant:
R.Z.S. Food Mart
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Nauman et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Katherine Nauman , Jackie Osborn , George Pearson and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
