Cases 61 - 70 of 9,687
Shaw v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW et al v. FADDEN
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHAW and LISA SHAW
Defendant:
MATTHEW FADDEN doing business as CUSTOM CARE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Shaw v. Habitat for Humanity et al
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Habitat for Humanity, Eula Jackson, Liz Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
