Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Wilfong v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02229
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Wilfong
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilfong v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-27190
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Wilfong
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Winston Holloway v. Benny Magness, et al
as 14-3383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Winston Holloway
Defendant - Appellee:
Benny Magness, Board Chairman, ADC, Artis Ray Hobbs, Director, ADC, Rory Griffin, Director and others
Wilfong v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27190
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Wilfong
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pemberton et al v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kirbi Pemberton , Melissa Wilfong , Janice Japa and others
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc. , Allied Services, Inc. and Bridgeton Landfill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilfong v. West Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2014cv21127
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilfong
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Corrections and McDowell County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
American VIP Limo LLC et al v. City of Greenville et al
as 6:2013cv03086
Plaintiff:
American VIP Limo LLC , American VIP Cab LLC , Otmane Benouis and others
Defendant:
City of Greenville , Jeff Bowman , Jodie Dudash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Quinnard Shuler
as 13-7408
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
QUINNARD SHULER, a/k/a Nardo, a/k/a Glenn Wilfong
Holloway v. Magness et al
as 5:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
Winston Holloway
Defendant:
Benny Magness, Artis Ray Hobbs, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
