Cases 61 - 70 of 3,275
Williams v. US Marshalls et al
as 3:2021cv01472
Plaintiff:
Bridgette D. Williams
Defendant:
US Marshalls, William Barr, Warden Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Trump et al
as 3:2021cv00625
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Donald Trump, William Barr, Tina Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv00561
Petitioner:
Melvin R. Paul
Respondent:
A. W. Brown and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67821
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BARR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILES v. BARR et al
as 1:2021cv02271
Not Classified By Court:
KELVIN J. MILES, WILLIAM BARR, JOHN ASHCROFT and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN MILES
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Grandinetti v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Vice President Michael Pence, Attorney General William Barr, Jeff Rosen and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Gillis
as 21-60634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louis Gonzalez, also known as Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant / Appellee:
Shawn R. Gillis, Stanley Crockett, Chad Wolf and others
Daniel et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2021cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D: Daniel and Wenona Calloway Daniel
Defendant:
Steven S: Neff, Christopher D: Poole, Deanora J: Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
