Cases 71 - 80 of 29,628
ROBINSON v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06446
Plaintiff:
DIANE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Robinson v. Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC
as 4:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Robinson
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Missouri, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant:
RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARCY WAXMAN and others
Kelvin Frazier v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-11705
Plaintiff:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICKY D. DIXON, J. ROBINSON, J. HOLTZ and others
Robinson v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
