Cases 71 - 80 of 913
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Lanier v. J. Burns
as 22-7169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO EDWIN LANIER
Defendant / Appellee:
J. BURNS, Sheriff Officer, Henderson County Sheriff's Office and Z. CAPPS, Sheriff Officer, Henderson County Sheriff's Office
Capps et al v. Henderson County et al
as 6:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
MD Robert Capps and RN Aily Hoang
Defendant:
Henderson County and James Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05714
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Monica Capps and Dawn Michelle Fleetwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Capps et al
as 6:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Gloria Aiken
Defendant:
Sabrina Capps, Audrey A. England, Aslee M Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Capps et al.
as 4:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
Gloria Aiken
Defendant:
Sabrina Capps, Audrey A England, Aslee M Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bankwell Bank v. Medlegal LLP et al
as 3:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Bankwell Bank
Defendant:
Medlegal LLP, Medlogic, LLC, Harry R Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
CAPPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12748
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ALLEN CAPPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quint Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04999
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Perez v. Capps et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ernie Perez
Defendant:
Joe Capps, J. Miller, J. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
