Cases 71 - 80 of 10,336
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dollar v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dollar
Defendant:
Derek Adams, Chasta Harrison and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harrison v. Commissoner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Billy Graves Harrison and Karina M. Witherbee
Defendant:
Commissoner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wood v. Pozeg et al
as 7:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Defendant:
Michael Pozeg, Larry Meadows, J. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Harrison v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Winston L. Harrison
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters and Lanetta Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
