Cases 71 - 80 of 136
Carolyn Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson
as 14-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN LEWIS
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS, AUGUSTINA BROWN-SINGLETARY, ANDRE SINGLETARY-SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, GYNECARE and AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lewis v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Reese Lane and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
MARILYN LEWIS and KENNETH LEWIS
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv07529
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Lewis and Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS, et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et al
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
MARILYN LEWIS and KENNETH LEWIS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and C R BARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Lewis David Patterson
Defendant:
Kenneth Lewis and Simpson County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
