Cases 81 - 90 of 1,911
William Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, P.C., et al
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAVAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and COLLENE K. CORCORAN
Ellen Russ v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.
as 23-277
Petitioner:
ELLEN RUSS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., MARRIOTT RESORTS HOSPITALITY CORPORATION, OCEANWATCH VILLAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Grice #254091 v. Hairston et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Arthur Grice #254091
Defendant:
Unknown Hairston, Jonathan Bowman, Kendra Warman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Rankin v. Harris Teeter, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02864
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rankin
Defendant:
Harris Teeter LLC, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, PC et al
as 5:2023cv12183
Plaintiff:
William A. Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Lavan and Associates, PC and Collene K Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DONNER v. RANKIN et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DONNER
Defendant:
MARK RANKIN and NEW BERN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rankins v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Jeremy Rankins
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
