Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Morgan v. Brown et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00409
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Warden Brown, Warden Luckett, Cpt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05890
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Vaughn
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaughn v. Doe et al
as 2:2026cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Vaughn
Defendant:
Doe and CC Jail of West Memphis Ark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Cincinnati et al
as 1:2026cv00497
Plaintiff:
Marcus Sapp
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Detective John Horn, Detective Douglas Lindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Vaughn, Jeremy v. Karlen, Aaron et al
as 3:2026cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C. Vaughn
Defendant:
Aaron Karlen, Jacob Chittium, Lt. Melinda Pauls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Harris v. Dattilo et al
as 3:2026cv00752
Plaintiff:
Leroy Harris
Defendant:
John A. Dattilo, Vaughn Maher, Donna Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv50195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
