Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al(MAG+)
as 3:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
Dammuon Epps, Tanya Griffin, K. A. E. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Alabama Department of Early Childhood Education, Alabama Administrative Office of Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis and Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:17-cv-11079
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
USA v. Kenneth Davi
as 17-11416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH DAVIS
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11079
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Wayne County Emergency and/or EMS et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
Wayne County Emergency and/or EMS, #1 John Doe Wayne Co. Emergency/EMS Technician and #2 John Doe Wayne Co. Emergency/EMS Technician
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
